Fursa Sergey Biography

He received higher education at the National Technical University of Ukraine, where he studied the analyst of the financial market. In the year, he received the post of head of the department of analytics and industry research at the bank, and also took up lending to the Renaissance Capital investment company. Then for about 3 years he worked as a senior analyst at Astrum Investment Management.

In the year I got a job at the Dragon Capital investment enterprise, where he works as a specialist in the sales department of debt securities to this day. Opinions about the nationalization of Privatbank in one of his articles Sergei Fursa outlined his opinion on the nationalization of the largest and most scandalous bank of the country. According to him, Privat had already had serious problems for a long time, despite the assurances of his owners that the bank was stable, Gontareva deceived everyone, and the state brazenly took the asset.

However, the state took not an asset, but a passive with debts of several billion dollars and other problems, ”the analyst is sure. The author does not deny that Privatbank today is the most advanced and technological bank in Ukraine, and that the state is not the best owner. However, he emphasizes that due to convenience, the client should not turn a blind eye to the fact that he is robbed.

As an example, Fursa leads an analogy with street robbers: no matter how stylish and smiling they are, no matter what modern pistols they have, we will still declare them to the police, but we will not ignore or protect. Therefore, according to the analyst, the attitude to Privatbank, which led from the structure of about 5 billion dollars of his depositors, should be the same.

Fursa also noted that the nationalization of privat was forced, given its scale and influence on the country's financial system, in order to maintain the finalization and all the “benefits” that customers use. The analyst believes the great merit of the state that the authorities made her friendly, having managed to agree with the owners and, possibly, even promising them freedom.

However, the task of the company is to demand from the owners of the privat to return 5 billion dollars, which Ukrainians paid from their pockets. Summing up his thoughts, Fursa says that despite the fact that the state is a bad owner with corrupt managers, but it can offer stability that customers are most necessary. The decision on the illegality of the nationalization of the privat, the expert in the field of finance Sergey Fursa painfully perceived the news that the nationalization of Privatbank was recognized as an illegal district administrative court.

Not forgetting to mention other "sins" of this court such as the removal of Ulyana Suprun, the blocking of customs reform, the ban on Euromaidan, the analyst began to talk about the consequences of this decision for Ukraine. In his opinion, nothing will change much at once, since there will be an appeal, the Supreme Court. On the depositors, this will not affect, so you should not panic and run behind your deposits.

But foreign investors can respond, because for them this means the abolition of important reforms that were carried out by filing foreign creditors. However, if the last instance recognizes the nationalization of Privatbank illegal, this will lead to huge problems for the entire banking system of Ukraine, Fursa is sure. He explains his position by the fact that the idea of ​​nationalization of privat was developed by the International Monetary Fund, which introduced this program in order to avoid large -scale destruction of the entire banking system in case of bankruptcy of the financial institution.

In the sake of maintaining the asset, the IMF in a long and difficult way introduced this program, observing how the bank owners withdrew money from the country. Now, if the court decision enters into force, the state will not only be forced to forgive Kolomoisky with a debt of $ 5 billion and this is all our money, give him a bank and pay moral damage in the amount of several billion dollars, but, having large external debts, destroy relations with the IMF, which is worst.

According to Sergei Furs, today the economic stability of Ukraine is completely dependent on relations with the IMF, without which the default will come in the country: hryvnia will fall, prices will rise, a mass reduction will occur. The analyst is sure that the nationalization of privat was inevitable, as this saved the institution from its complete liquidation. And if Privatbank was eliminated, the third of the banking system of Ukraine would collapse, which would bring big problems to millions of people.

And the court decision on the illegality of nationalization only indicates that Kolomoisky is desperately trying to maintain his assets. This is not a lot and not a little - national humiliation. The country was first raped, and now they ask to apologize for this, ”the outcome of Fursa sums up. And in one of the publications, the financier criticized the intentions of the president of Vladimir Zelensky then to pay pensions to residents of the occupied territories.Despite the fact that many Ukrainians like a simple “guy who is worried about the old people,” the so -called “father of the nation,” Sergey writes, few people thought how the newly made president plans to realize this.

He can do this only in two ways: by transferring money to pensioners to cards or paying in cash. This means that Zelensky will either have to abandon this idea, or recognize the occupation authorities and use their banking system. Machines with money with money that will be distributed to the same invaders are also not an option to be distributed to those regions. Therefore, the Ukrainian state does not pay pensions to people in the east not because it is bad, but because it cannot do this, ”said Fursa, adding that Zelensky should understand this, and not engage in frank populism.

The financier began about the attitude of Ukrainians to the rich thought by talking about attacks on Sergei Leshchenko for buying an expensive apartment in the center of Kyiv. According to Furs, the ill -wishers of the people's deputy have long been trying to discredit it by organized and coordinated information attacks.

And this despite the fact that Leshchenko is an unremarkable deputy, without a rating, party beliefs and other factors. The author believes that all this suggests that the opponents of Leshchenko are fighting not so much with himself as with our attempts to defeat corruption in the country. Because they do not write about the yachts of the clamp, real estate Kononenko, fire engines Lyashko or Pashinsky factories.

They put up the villains of Aivaras, who spoke about the corruption of the same Kononenko, Saakashvili, who exposed corruption at state -owned enterprises, and the people like them. The most sad Sergey Fursa believes that a large number of ordinary Ukrainians supported the attack on Leshchenko simply because he had achieved success and bought a good apartment.

The author explains this reaction of the public with “soviet” thinking, stereotypes in our heads, who say that being successful is ashamed, and rich are bad. Ukrainians got stuck somewhere in the Middle Ages, so they really need to reform such understandings, to update thinking, without which we cannot build European society. Persona mention.