Ulvan biography

Sheikh Ahmad ibn Salikh Az-Zhustanya: Doctor of Sciences in Akyda, formerly the head of the Committee “Call to the approved and the prohibition of the condemned” in the city currently works as a teacher at the University. King Abdulaziz as an assistant professor. I heard from Sheikh Suleiman al-Ulvan, whom his followers call “Sheikh Ul-Islam”, words about which, I cannot imagine that they come out of a person who understands what he says.

Even earlier, I heard about him different things that I did not want to believe in, adhering to the best assumptions about him. I did not follow what he was saying, and what they say about him. And I am not interested in clarifying his scientific significance in fact, despite the conversations with the overwhelming of him, since I do not need him-neither in his small knowledge, and all the praise of Llahu, who made for us the words of large knowledge of Sharia and Sunnah from among contemporaries in modern issues, and from among the imams-salyans in old questions.

So: I heard his record, he spoke in her about the legality of the condemned person, about the opinions of scientists on this issue, but he spoke in this record against those whom he called the Jamites, and stated that disagreement with them in the foundations of faith, and that they follow the Iman's matters of the extreme Jakhimites!

I swear by Allah, as soon as I heard these words, I immediately remembered the story of Beduin, who came to complain to the ruler of his enemy, and said: “Truly, he will correct you Allah - Steel, Rafiite, Jahmit, Musabbih, Mujabibir, Kadarit, scolds Khadjaja Ibue Zubeyra, who destroyed Kaaba in Ali Ibn Ili. Abi Sufyan, and curses Muavia ibn Abi Taliba. ” The ruler answered him: “I don’t even know what I am surprised: your knowledge of the genealogy or your knowledge in the beliefs of different sects!

While he is from among those calling for justice and, the so -called correction! Everyone who is in the know knows that the question in the iman, in which some of those whom he calls Jamites deviated, nothing, nor from afar, has nothing to do with Mazhab Jahmites, that is, extreme Murdjiites. And those who conflict in the issue of Iman, from among those whom he calls Jamites, say that Iman is words and deeds that things are included in the essence of Iman, that Iman is increasing and decreasing that some of the great sins will enter into the fire, they confirm faith in the intercession, do the truth in the iman, and deviated only in the matter of practical, according to the basis This question: is the one who left things as a look becoming infidel?

And if they were mistaken and agreed with the Murdjiites in some of their opinions in subtle issues, does this make it allowed to defend them and calling them by extreme murdjiites? And the extreme Murdjiites are Jahmits who say that Iman is only cognition, without words and without affairs of hidden and obvious, and the one who refused to utter evidence with his language, and did not establish in Allah, is a believer if he knew Allah with his Serdem.

And other beliefs that are known to those who got acquainted with books about the beliefs of the Jahmit Mazhab. May Allah Imam Ahmad have mercy. Hamdan ibn Ali al-Uarrak told him, speaking about the Murdjiites with him: "They say: if a person has known his Lord with his heart, then he is a believer." Imam Ahmad said: “Murdjiites do not say this. This is Jahmits.

The Murdjiites say: "... and said the testimony with his language, and does business with his organs." And Jahmits say: "When he knew his Lord with his heart, even if he did not do anything with his organs." Al-Khallal “al-Sunna” look at the Sheikh Ul-Islam, wishing the truth and truth: how he distinguished between the Mazhabs of the devastating and did not blame some of them of the opinions of others, despite the fact that they caused him the strongest troubles.

Al-Lalyakai leads and this is the truth, which was far from confirmed by not one of the imams-salafs, that is, the fact that Mazhab Murdjia-Fukakha, who say that Iman is a confirmation by the heart and pronunciation of the tongue, and that things are not in the essence of the iman are very close to the Mazhab Salafs, so that some imams calculated the disagreement with them only to the figurative, disagreement.

in the wording. After all, the fact that things are a necessary manifestation of faith in the heart, or are part of the faith, with unanimity that the great sin does not leave Iman, and the decision of his fate depends on the will of Allah, if Allah wishes, then punishes him, and if he wishes, then he will only disagree in the formulation, the result of which is not the indignation of convictions.

And there are no disagreements among the adherents of the Sunnah that Allah wishes words and deeds from slaves. Under the words I mean faith in my heart and confirmation of the language. This is expected by Allah from the slaves what is meant by their words: "Iman is words and deeds."And this, required by slaves: whether Iman is covered by all this with the name, or is Iman - this is a certain part of this, these are just words, and things are different from them, and they are not covered by the name Iman when it is mentioned without a ligament; And if things are called Iman, then this is a metaphor.

And the imams are unanimous, that if a person believed in the heart, confirmed his tongue and resisted the commission of affairs, then he disobeyed Allah and his messenger, and deserves to be addressed to him. ” Sheikh Ul-Islam Ibn Taymiy said: “You should know that most of the controversy among Ahlu-Sunna regarding this issue is disagreement in the wording.

Since those facts who say that Iman is without deeds are unanimous with all the imams that committing sins are among those who deserve reproach and punishment. And despite the fact that they say that their iman is full-fledged, like Djibril, they are still convinced that Iman is entailing a punishment without an act, as Akhl Sunna Wal-Jamaa says. And they also say that among the great sins there are those who enter the fire, as they say this is Ahlu Sunna Wal-Jamaa.

And those of the Ahlu Sunna, who do not describe the sinner by the name Iman, do not say that he is a believer, unanimous, that he will not be forever in fire. Thus, there is no disagreement between the facts of this community regarding sins, they all confirmed and obviously and hidden what the messenger came with. ” The outstanding scientist Az-Zahabi said: “Many scientists of this community were on Irdja.

And these are an Irdge of their words: “I am a truly believer before Allah,” despite the fact that they admit that they don’t know what a Muslim will die on - faith or unbelief. These words are not so dangerous. Truly, the extreme Murdjiites say: “Iman is only beliefs in the hearts, and who left the prayer and zakat, drinks wine, kills and adultery - they all have a full -fledged iman and will not enter hell, and will not be punished.” And therefore, they rejected the numerous hadiths of intercession, and gave the courage to every wicked and robber to make destructive sins.

We resort to Allah from leaving us without support. ” And what I wanted to point out with the words of Imam Az-Zahabi and others-this is their separation between Mazhab Murdjia-Fukakha and the Jahmitic Calymist Murdzhiy Mazhab. And it must be taken into account that the majority of the words of the Salafs about Irji and the censure of the Murdjiites belong to the Murjia -Fukakha, and the mutacallimes -jahimites fall under this censure all the more.

I say: if such were the words of Sheikh Ul-Islam about Murdjia-Fukakha, then those of the contemporaries who deviated in the question of “affairs as a species”-there is no doubt that their opinion does not make them murdjiite! And the biggest that can be said about them is that they agree with the Murdjiites in some of their opinions. Moreover, the word "Irdja" is not applied to them without restrictions.

Moreover, it is not said about them that they are at Mazhaba Jahmites, as a certain one of those who conquered their minds of their envy and embittance on the salafites, which warned of his Charijan wandering, his takfirist bustle, his fatvas, who abandoned the best youth of this community into the fire of takfirist groups, and their indocation in countries claims. Muslims. And he did not leave the opportunity: he began to defend the adherents of the Sunnah, scolding, calling and raising slander.

He calls them "jamites", and then defeats them. As his salafs from among the deviating did - they came up with nicknames for the adherents of the Sunnah, with the help of which it was easier to defame them. And if you leave this issue, then most of what this deviated who calls those he calls the “Jamites” is what Sheikh Ibn Baz, Sheikh Ibn Usaimin and Sheikh al -Albani, may have mercy on all of them Allah.

And it is possible to know what he hides within himself against these imams, based on the attitude of his followers and admirers, many of whom were involved in takfirist groups. Their words about these sheikhs are frank ridicule and blasphemy, everyone knows this who has any relationship with them. We ask Allah for forgiveness and well -being, we also ask him for forgiveness of sins, concealment of shortcomings, suggestions of humility and dependence in front of you, resistance to religion and Sunnah.

And may Allah bless the Prophet Muhammad and his family of followers.